Audited
What ChatGPT and Claude actually say about 25 founder tools.
One click per tool. What the models invented, what they got confused about, and the .gist.design patch that would fix it.
- Poor
Beehiiv
beehiiv.com
ChatGPT invents a feature Beehiiv doesn't ship — claiming built-in video chat and AI meeting summaries that aren't on the product.
4 issues · 2 criticalSee audit → - Poor
Fly.io
fly.io
ChatGPT invents a feature Fly.io doesn't ship — claiming built-in video chat and AI meeting summaries that aren't on the product.
5 issues · 2 criticalSee audit → - Poor
Gumroad
gumroad.com
ChatGPT invents a feature Gumroad doesn't ship — claiming built-in video chat and AI meeting summaries that aren't on the product.
4 issues · 2 criticalSee audit → - Poor
Lovable
lovable.dev
ChatGPT invents a feature Lovable doesn't ship — claiming built-in video chat and AI meeting summaries that aren't on the product.
4 issues · 2 criticalSee audit → - Poor
Supabase
supabase.com
ChatGPT invents a feature Supabase doesn't ship — claiming built-in video chat and AI meeting summaries that aren't on the product.
5 issues · 2 criticalSee audit → - Poor
Turso
turso.tech
ChatGPT invents a feature Turso doesn't ship — claiming built-in video chat and AI meeting summaries that aren't on the product.
5 issues · 2 criticalSee audit → - Partial
Bolt
bolt.new
ChatGPT categorises Bolt as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
4 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
Cursor
cursor.com
ChatGPT categorises Cursor as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
3 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
Figma
figma.com
ChatGPT categorises Figma as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
5 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
GitHub
github.com
ChatGPT categorises GitHub as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
3 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
PostHog
posthog.com
ChatGPT invents a feature PostHog doesn't ship — claiming built-in video chat and AI meeting summaries that aren't on the product.
4 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
Raycast
raycast.com
ChatGPT categorises Raycast as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
4 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
Replit
replit.com
ChatGPT categorises Replit as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
3 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
Resend
resend.com
ChatGPT categorises Resend as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
3 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
Stripe
stripe.com
ChatGPT categorises Stripe as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
3 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
Tailwind CSS
tailwindcss.com
ChatGPT invents a feature Tailwind CSS doesn't ship — claiming built-in video chat and AI meeting summaries that aren't on the product.
5 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Partial
v0
v0.app
ChatGPT categorises v0 as a "project management tool" while Claude describes it as a "design collaboration platform." The two positions imply different competitor sets and different buyers.
5 issues · 1 criticalSee audit → - Good
Framer
framer.com
Both models claim Framer has a Slack integration that has never existed on the product.
3 issues · 0 criticalSee audit → - Good
Linear
linear.app
Both models claim Linear has a Slack integration that has never existed on the product.
3 issues · 0 criticalSee audit → - Good
Notion
notion.so
ChatGPT says Notion is self-hosted, Claude says it's cloud-only. The site says both are available.
3 issues · 0 criticalSee audit → - Good
Plausible
plausible.io
Both models claim Plausible has a Slack integration that has never existed on the product.
3 issues · 0 criticalSee audit → - Good
Railway
railway.app
Both models claim Railway has a Slack integration that has never existed on the product.
4 issues · 0 criticalSee audit → - Good
shadcn/ui
ui.shadcn.com
ChatGPT says shadcn/ui is self-hosted, Claude says it's cloud-only. The site says both are available.
3 issues · 0 criticalSee audit → - Good
Vercel
vercel.com
ChatGPT says Vercel is free, Claude says it's $99/month enterprise-only. The truth is a freemium model with a $29 pro tier.
3 issues · 0 criticalSee audit → - Good
Webflow
webflow.com
Both models claim Webflow has a Slack integration that has never existed on the product.
4 issues · 0 criticalSee audit →
Audit your own product
Enter a URL on the homepage and we'll show you how ChatGPT and Claude describe it — and what's wrong.
Run a free audit →